Rethinking the Church
I first became acquainted with the writings of James Emery White several years ago when I received one of his books by accident from my IVP book club. The book was Serious Times and I almost sent it back. It sat on my desk for probably a year before I picked it up and started thumbing through it. I’m glad I did, as it was one of the best books I’ve read in the last 10 years.
Rethinking Church is an earlier work of his (originally 1997 and revised in 2003) and it came highly by several people I respect. Going in to the book, I had several fears of what a book on “doing church” might be like. Usually, these types of books fall into two groups. The first group simply points out how horrible a job the church is doing. Statistics abound to show why the church is ineffectual in our modern society. This group is long on criticism and negativity while short on constructive ideas. The second group of books focus primarily on the “how to” of church. They peddle the latest and greatest programs and many times are written by the newest megachurch celebrity pastor. This group offers lots of advice on what to do, but rarely addresses the deeper theological issues or takes into account the differences in geography, personality, or background of churches.
It is at this point that Rethinking Church diverges from the pack. White does an admirable job of bridging the two needs of a book on leading a church: theory and practice. Specifically, the author addresses eight areas that need to be evaluated in the church: Foundational Questions, Evangelism, Discipleship, Ministry, Worship, Structure, Community, and Change. Each of these chapters deal with the need for change and offers both biblical and practical ideas for rethinking them. In each area, White does a very good job of not only challenging long held assumptions, but offering constructive ideas for moving forward.
The book has two primary strengths. First, it is short and simple (barely over 160 pages.) It can be read in a short time and is not overly difficult. Through concise illustrations and statistics, White drives home his point without being negative or critical. At the end, the reader thinks, “Hey, this is a very doable thing that God has called us to.”
The second strength is that there is a distinct lack of programming suggestions. There is no lack of books espousing the latest ideas on programming. White freely admits that “Why and what” we do are foundational to “how” we do it. I appreciate that he allows the specific implementation of the biblical principles to the individual. He respects the church enough to know that one size, copy-cat programs do not work.
I highly recommend this book to every church leader, whether on staff or volunteer. It is not the deepest or the latest book on how to do church, but it is a very accessible and useful launching pad for those who take seriously the Great Commission.
This past year has been one of the most difficult for me in ministry. Many circumstances collided into the “perfect storm” of being over committed, over worked, over eating, under rested, and generally operating beyond healthy boundaries in most areas of my life. In the back of my mind, I knew that June was coming. Every five years, the ministers on staff at HCC are blessed to take a one month sabbatical from ministry at the church. I knew that I needed something to guide my time off.
I loved the Muppet Show as a kid (technically, I probably still do.) It was kind of a zany show with so many interesting characters. My two favorite characters, though, were the grumpy old men who sat in the balcony making fun of everyone. Liking those two guys probably shows what I am deep down in my core…a critic.
In Quantum Observation #3, I wrote about incorrect individual measures of spirituality. This list included Bible knowledge, perceived spirituality of others, personal morality, Christian “busyness”, and church membership. The basic premise is that Christians often use these qualitites (for lack of a better word) as incorrect measures of spiritual in themselves and in others. Now, before you get all frothy at the mouth, I’m not saying that these qualities are bad. In fact, I believe just the opposite–they can all be definite signs of spirituality (except maybe the busyness thing). Spiritual people will have these life qualities. The correlary is not necessarily true, though. Having these life qualities does not mean a person is spiritual (at least not in the biblical sense.)
Their 2 Cents